Skip to content

Applying AgileBrain for Effective Communication and Conflict Resolution

Communication is at the core of human interaction. It shapes relationships, influences our success, and determines the outcomes of conflicts. However, effective communication is not as simple as speaking and listening; it involves understanding emotions, motivations, and unconscious biases. This article explores communication styles, challenges, the impact of social media, and how the AgileBrain framework’s Promotion (wanting more of the good) and Prevention (wanting less of the bad) polarity helps us communicate and resolve conflicts more effectively.

Communication Styles and Challenges

Four Main Communication Styles

(Adler & Towne, 2002)

Effective communication is largely influenced by an individual’s communication style. While each style has its place in certain situations, some are more effective than others when fostering understanding and resolving conflicts.

By recognizing and adapting to different communication styles while overcoming these common challenges, individuals can foster clearer, more meaningful interactions and navigate conflicts more effectively.

Passive Communication Style

The Passive communicator avoids expressing their thoughts, needs, and desires. They often prioritize the needs of others over their own, leading to frustration, resentment, and feelings of being overlooked. Passive communicators may struggle to assert themselves, leading to unresolved issues in personal and professional relationships. Their body language may include avoiding eye contact, speaking softly, and hesitating to take a stand. While this style can reduce immediate conflict, it often leads to long-term dissatisfaction and miscommunication.

Example: A team member who remains silent during meetings despite having concerns, leading to unresolved issues and frustration.

Agressive Communication Style

The Aggressive communicator dominates conversations, prioritizing their own needs and viewpoints while dismissing those of others. They often use a loud tone, direct eye contact, and commanding body language, which can make others feel intimidated or undervalued. Aggressive communicators may struggle to build trust, as their approach can be perceived as confrontational. While this style can be effective in getting immediate results, it damages relationships and often escalates conflicts rather than resolving them.

Example: A manager who demands results without listening to employee concerns, leading to high stress and disengagement.

Passive-Agressive Communication Style

The Passive-Aggressive communicator expresses resistance and frustration indirectly rather than addressing issues openly. Instead of voicing concerns directly, they may use sarcasm, subtle digs, or procrastination to convey dissatisfaction. They might agree outwardly while subtly undermining efforts behind the scenes. This style can be confusing and frustrating for others, as it creates tension without offering a path toward resolution. Passive-aggressive communication often results from a fear of direct confrontation but ultimately fosters resentment and a toxic communication environment.

Example: A colleague who agrees to help with a project but then intentionally delays progress out of resentment.

Assertive Communication Style

The Assertive communicator balances honesty, respect, and clarity, making it the most effective and constructive style. Assertive communicators express their thoughts and needs confidently while also valuing and respecting the perspectives of others. They use steady eye contact, an even tone, and open body language to foster understanding and collaboration. This approach encourages mutual respect, problem-solving, and trust-building in relationships. Assertive communication promotes open dialogue and is the foundation for effective conflict resolution.

Example: A friend who expresses their feelings calmly, stating, “I feel overwhelmed when I have too many responsibilities. Can we divide the tasks more evenly?”

In any communication or conflict situation, understanding the other person’s motivational drivers is crucial.

Common Challenges in Communication

While choosing an appropriate communication style is crucial, challenges often arise that hinder effective interactions. These obstacles can be both internal (cognitive biases, emotional triggers) and external (technological limitations, cultural differences)

Nonverbal Communication & Misinterpretation

  • Research suggests that a significant portion of communication is nonverbal (Mehrabian, 1972).
  • Facial expressions, gestures, posture, and tone can completely change the meaning of words.

Example: A nod in one culture may mean agreement, while in another, it might indicate understanding but not agreement.

Cultural & Generational Differences

  • Different cultures and generations have unique communication norms, expectations, and preferences.

Example: A younger employee might prefer quick Slack messages, while an older manager may prefer detailed emails or in-person discussions.

Digital Communication & Social Media

  • Text-based communication lacks tone, context, and body language, increasing the risk of misunderstandings.
  • Social media fosters instantaneous, reactionary interactions, which can escalate conflicts due to emotional impulsivity.
  • Algorithms often create echo chambers, reinforcing preexisting beliefs while limiting exposure to opposing viewpoints.

Example: A heated debate on Twitter spirals into personal attacks due to lack of context and emotional regulation.

Cognitive Biases & Emotional Filtering

  • Past experiences, personal emotions, and preconceptions distort how we interpret messages.
  • Confirmation Bias: People interpret information in a way that confirms what they already believe.
  • Negativity Bias: Negative information carries more emotional weight than positive information.

Example: A supervisor provides a mix of positive and negative constructive feedback, but an employee perceives it as overly critical due to increased attention and reactivity to negative feedback.

Fear of Conflict & Avoidance

  • Many individuals avoid difficult conversations out of fear of confrontation or discomfort.
  • This leads to unspoken resentment, increased misunderstandings, and unresolved issues.

Example: A couple avoiding discussing financial disagreements, leading to hidden frustrations and long-term stress.

By recognizing and adapting to different communication styles while overcoming these common challenges, individuals can foster clearer, more meaningful interactions and navigate conflicts more effectively.

The AgileBrain Framework: Understanding Emotional Drivers in Communication

The AgileBrain neuroscience exercise reveals human emotions and motivations by identifying the good feelings one wants more of (Promotion Needs) and the bad feelings one wants less of (Prevention Needs). Understanding these emotional drivers helps refine communication and conflict resolution strategies.

Promotion vs. Prevention Mindsets

(Regulatory Focus Theory)

  • Promotion Needs: Focus on aspirations, growth, and success. These individuals prefer optimistic, forward-looking communication.
  • Prevention Needs: Focus on security, responsibility, and risk avoidance. They seek safety and clear expectations in conversations.

Each person operates on a spectrum of Promotion and Prevention Needs across different domains, shaping their communication preferences and reactions in conflicts.

How Emotional Drivers Influence Communication and Body Language

Understanding the feelings we want to experience more or less influences how we express ourselves. Our emotional drivers, mapped in AgileBrain’s framework, shape our communication tendencies and body language.

By understanding these emotional drivers, we can tailor our communication to match the needs of others, ensuring greater clarity, engagement, and trust.

Below is how each emotional need impacts communication:

Safety vs. Insecurity

Promotion: Safety

Someone who seeks Safety in conversations will generally try to be open, relaxed, and confident, using steady eye contact and controlled gestures. They seek to create an environment of trust to promote clarity and reassurance in discussions.

Prevention: Insecurity

Someone seeking to avoid Insecurity may be defensive, avoid eye contact, or cross their arms, signaling discomfort or distrust. They need structured and reassuring communication to feel less insecure.

Autonomy vs. Disempowerment

Promotion: Autonomy

Those who desire Autonomy express themselves assertively, using expansive gestures and direct speech. They appreciate open-ended questions and flexible discussions.

Prevention: Disempowerment

Those seeking to reduce feelings of Disempowerment may appear downtrodden, seek approval before speaking, or use overly cautious language. Signal permission to be candid about needs.

Inclusion vs. Exclusion

Promotion: Inclusion

Individuals who seek greater feelings of Inclusion tend to be socially engaged, leaning in, nodding, and mirroring body language. They use inclusive phrases like “we” and “us.”

Prevention: Exclusion

Those trying to reduce feelings of Exclusion may withdraw, hesitate before speaking, or overcompensate with excessive agreeableness to avoid rejection. Signal acceptance and belonging despite potential disagreement.

Justice vs. Injustice

Promotion: Justice

A strong desire for Justice leads to firm, deliberate speech, maintaining eye contact and using assertive gestures.

Prevention: Injustice

Someone trying to prevent Injustice may express anger, lose patience with niceties, or exhibit frustration through tense body language. Validate these feelings and signal commitment to fairness in discussions.

Authenticity vs. Conformity

Promotion: Authenticity

Those valuing Authenticity use expressive speech, fluid hand movements, and personal storytelling.

Prevention: Conformity

Those avoiding Conformity pressures might restrain their expressions, modify opinions to fit others, or appear uncomfortable in disagreement. They need space to express themselves.

Immersion vs. Stagnation

Promotion: Immersion

Individuals seeking Immersion are highly engaged, maintaining focus and using enthusiastic speech.

Prevention: Stagnation

Those seeking to reduce feelings of Stagnation may fidget, lose eye contact, or disengage if the conversation lacks stimulation. They require dynamic and interactive discussions and may need to be prompted to re-engage.

Caring vs. Uncaring

Promotion: Caring

A person valuing Caring will be empathetic, use warm tones, and maintain open body language.

Prevention: Uncaring

Those seeking to reduce feeling Uncared for may present with hurt feelings in response to perceived rejection. They need emotional validation in conversations.

Ethics vs. Wrongdoing

Promotion: Ethics

Ethics-driven individuals speak with conviction, maintain eye contact, and use persuasive arguments.

Prevention: Wrongdoing

Those seeking to reduce feelings of Wrongdoing may express disgust or second-guess decisions. They seek clarity in moral discussions.

Potential vs. Limitation

Promotion: Potential

People who value fulfilling their Potential use expansive, goal-oriented language and encourage brainstorming.

Prevention: Limitation

Those avoiding Limitation may be risk-averse and express skepticism. They need assurance before committing to ideas.

Success vs. Failure

Promotion: Success

Success-driven individuals exude confidence, take initiative in conversations, and use motivational language.

Prevention: Failure

Those avoiding Failure may hesitate before speaking, downplay their achievements, or seek reassurance. They require encouragement and constructive feedback.

Recognition vs. Scorn

Promotion: Recognition

Those who crave Recognition may be animated and expressive, seeking acknowledgment in conversations.

Prevention: Scorn

Those fearing Scorn may downplay accomplishments or be overly deferential. They need respectful engagement.

Purpose vs. Materialism

Promotion: Purpose

Purpose-driven individuals use visionary language and make broad connections in conversations.

Prevention: Materialism

Those avoiding Materialism may resist transactional discussions or question surface-level interactions. They need deeper, meaningful exchanges.

Step-by-Step: Applying AgileBrain Insights to Communication and Conflict Resolution

Step 1

Identify Your Communication Style & Emotional Drivers

Using the AgileBrain framework, reflect on your dominant promotion and prevention needs. Ask yourself:

  • Do I focus on growth (Promotion) or security (Prevention) in conversations?
  • What emotional triggers cause me to react defensively or disengage?
  • How do my emotional needs influence my communication style?

Self-awareness is the first step to improving how we interact with others. For example, recognizing whether you seek Autonomy, Inclusion, or Justice (Promotion) or seek to prevent Disempowerment, Exclusion, or Injustice (Prevention) allows you to adjust how you express yourself in conversations.

Step 2

Recognize the Other Person’s Emotional Drivers

In any communication or conflict situation, understanding the other person’s motivational drivers is crucial. Ideally, the other person would complete the AgileBrain exercise as well. But if they did not, observing their body language, tone, and emotional responses will help you tailor your communication to their needs.

  • Is the other person motivated by advancement and Success (Promotion)? They may prefer visionary discussions, innovation, and positive reinforcement.
  • Are they concerned about Insecurity and instability (Prevention)? They may need clear guidelines, risk mitigation, and structured solutions.
  • Are they seeking Recognition (Promotion) or trying to avoid Scorn (Prevention)? This influences how they interpret praise or criticism.

Step 3

Advocate for Yourself Effectively

Advocating for yourself means expressing your needs clearly while maintaining mutual respect and fostering collaboration. Here’s how:

  • Align with Your Emotional Drivers: If you are Promotion-focused, frame your request in terms of growth, opportunity, and progress. If you are Prevention-focused, emphasize security, fairness, and stability.
  • Use Assertive Communication: Be direct but respectful. Instead of saying, “You never listen to me,” try, “I need to feel heard in our discussions so we can collaborate more effectively.”
  • Clarify Your Boundaries: If you need more Autonomy, express it in a way that highlights benefits to both parties. If you want to avoid Exclusion, openly share your desire to be involved in decision-making.
  • Acknowledge the Other Person’s Perspective: Balance your advocacy by recognizing their needs. If they prioritize Justice, ensure fairness in your request. If they seek Success, align your ask with shared goals.

Step 4

Adapt Communication Strategies Based on Emotional Needs

Once you understand both your and the other person’s emotional drivers, adjust your communication to foster understanding and cooperation.

  • For Promotion-Oriented Individuals: Use aspirational language, focus on opportunities, and avoid excessive caution or constraints. Acknowledge their ideas and potential.
  • For Prevention-Oriented Individuals: Provide reassurance, clarify risks, and emphasize responsibility and security. Offer clear, structured feedback and avoid ambiguity.

Example: If a colleague is Prevention-focused and worried about injustice, highlight fairness and procedural integrity in your discussion. If they are Promotion-focused and driven by success, emphasize growth, achievement, and potential rewards.

Step 5

Prepare for Conflict Resolution Using AgileBrain Insights

Create Psychological Safety

If someone has a high Prevention for Insecurity, reassure them before addressing difficult topics. Make them feel heard and valued.

Use Reflective Listening

Mirror their emotional state and rephrase their concerns for validation. This is especially important for those trying to prevent Exclusion or Injustice.

Frame Solutions in Their Preferred Language

Offer growth-based solutions for Promotion-focused individuals and stability-driven resolutions for Prevention-focused individuals.

Find Common Ground

Align shared values, whether it’s a desire for fairness (Justice), mutual respect (Inclusion), or personal success (Recognition).

Choose the Right Medium

If a person values Autonomy, a structured email may work better than an impromptu phone call. If they seek Inclusion, a face-to-face conversation may be best.

Address Emotional Triggers Before Problem-Solving

If someone is feeling disempowered, dismissed, or unseen, address their emotional needs before moving to logistics or solutions.

Step 6

Follow-Up and Reinforce Positive Communication

After resolving a conflict or an important conversation, ensure that mutual understanding is reinforced:

  • Summarize key points of agreement and next steps.
  • Check in later to see if the other person feels heard and respected.
  • Continue adapting your communication based on their emotional needs.

Key Take-Aways

Effective communication and conflict resolution require more than just words; they require a deep understanding of our emotional drivers. By integrating AgileBrain’s insights about Promotion (want more) and Prevention (want less) into our communication strategies, we can navigate difficult conversations with greater emotional intelligence, foster deeper relationships, and resolve conflicts with greater success.

J.D. Pincus, Ph.D. is Chief Innovation Officer at Leading Indicator Systems (d/b/a AgileBrain), focusing on emerging methods for measuring emotion and motivation. He developed the unified pyramid model of human motivation and the AgileBrain measurement technique. He published his model in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, and has gone on to apply the pyramid model to the problems of Human Values, Employee Engagement, Subjective Well-Being, Organizational Culture, Leadership Effectiveness, Team Effectiveness, and Human Goals. His seminal article on the concept of motivation in applied psychology, published in the Journal of Consumer Behaviour, has been cited in 222 subsequent papers. He lives in Massachusetts, with his wife, a Maltipoo puppy named Bean, and a black cat named Salem. His book, The Emotionally Agile Brain: Mastering the 12 Emotional Needs that Drive Us, was recently published by Rowman & Littlefield/Bloomsbury.

Related Posts

The Emotionally Agile Brain
Mastering the 12 Emotional Needs that Drive Us

by J.D. Pincus, Ph. D.

Order Today

Take AgileBrain

AgileBrain takes just 3 minutes! Understanding your emotional needs is the first step towards positive change.

Take AgileBrain

30 Day FREE Trial

We stand behind our assessment. We’d love to offer you a free trial of AgileBrain.

Sign Up Today

Get information on research and the science of emotions.

AgileBrain Logo

© Copyright AgileBrain® 2025 – All Rights Reserved
Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy

Back To Top